This is an analysis of the Norway–Germany relationship carried out with NORMAL ChatGPT, meaning what you receive when CRED is not used. For comparison, you may see how the same analysis appears when it is done with CRED ».

To make comparison easy, here is ChatGPT’s (without CRED) summary. You will see that it appears simpler, thinner and more self-evident than the CRED version:

---

ChatGPT analysis

You said:

Could you carry out an analysis of the tensions, but also the opportunities, that lie in the Norway–Germany relationship? Keep to the present moment.

ChatGPT said:

Here is a structured overview of the Norway–Germany relationship today — beginning with opportunities, followed by tensions — and ending with some assessments of the future.

Opportunities

1. Energy and power interconnection

• Norway and Germany cooperate on energy transmission, including through the NordLink cable (1,400 MW HVDC between Norway and Germany) which connects the two countries’ electricity systems. Wikipedia
  • This gives Norway the opportunity to export hydropower (and flexibility) to Germany, while Germany gains access to Norwegian system support.
  • For Norway it provides a valuable export channel and market integration with key European markets.
• More broadly, Germany and Norway have intensified cooperation to reach climate goals and advance the renewable transition. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action
  • For example, Germany seeks “green” and stable energy supply, while Norway possesses technology, renewable capacity and infrastructural potential.
• Defence and security: In September 2023, the two countries signed a declaration of intent to expand strategic cooperation on security and defence. Regjeringen.no
  • This strengthens Norway’s position as a strategic partner for Germany and gives Germany a stronger link to the Nordic and Arctic region via Norway.
• Trade and industry: Germany is one of Europe’s largest economies, and Norway supplies key resources (energy, raw materials) while also having potential for technology export to the German market.
• Geopolitical: Norway — not an EU member but part of the EEA — can serve as a bridge between Northern and Central Europe, where Germany is a key actor. This provides bilateral strategic potential.

Tensions

1. Energy and dependency issues

• Although NordLink is positive, it also raises questions about dependency, flexibility and control of power flow. This can fuel debate in Norway about how much it wishes to act as a “supplier” to Germany versus safeguarding domestic security of supply and price stability.
• There have also been challenges in the hydrogen partnership: it has been reported that Norway’s Equinor has scrapped plans to export “blue hydrogen” to Germany because the project was not financially viable. Reuters
  • This shows that large expectations and investments can face technical/economic and market realities — a potential source of disappointment or conflict.

2. Differences in politics, regulation and interests

• Norway is not a member of the European Union and therefore occupies a different position from Germany, an EU core country. This can lead to differing views on regulation, energy markets, trade and common European initiatives.
• For example, Norway faces challenges related to EU energy regulations and power export/import, which also affect Germany and other EU states. Financial Times

3. Geopolitical and strategic uncertainty

• Defence cooperation is strengthened, but Norway operates in a challenging geographical position (the High North, proximity to Russia) to which Germany is less directly exposed. This may lead to differing priorities in security policy.
• If Germany alters its energy or security policy (e.g., reducing dependency on certain suppliers), this may affect Norway — both as an energy provider and security partner.

4. Market risk and investment uncertainty

• Projects that presume German uptake or market commitment may encounter difficulties — as with the hydrogen example above. Such realities may create friction, particularly if expectations are not met.
• In addition, price volatility and regulatory change in Germany can affect Norwegian exports and industrial cooperation.

Assessment and what Norway and Germany should do

• To maximise opportunities, Norway and Germany should:
  1. Strengthen joint frameworks — clear agreements, risk-sharing and investment security for major infrastructure and energy projects.
  2. Increase coordination in the energy transition — Norway with hydropower, grid and offshore resources; Germany with industrial markets and technology. Combining complementary strengths creates mutual benefit.
  3. Enhance strategic dialogue — particularly in defence and security regarding the High North, the Arctic and Russian activity. Germany may benefit from Norwegian local knowledge and geographical position.
  4. Address weaknesses/risks openly — be realistic about project economics (such as hydrogen export) and prepared for the fact that not all plans will be realised.
• For Norway it is especially important not to become locked into a role as “supplier” without safeguarding its own interests: domestic security of supply, reasonable prices for citizens, and ensuring that export and cooperation do not undermine national control.
• For Germany it is essential to maintain diversification of energy sources, secure stable suppliers (such as Norway), and develop deeper understanding of the regional challenges (e.g., the High North) that Norway brings into the partnership.

Summary

The relationship between Norway and Germany is predominantly positive and characterised by many opportunities: energy cooperation, security partnership, trade and technology. At the same time, underlying tensions exist — from market and investment risks to differing institutional frameworks and strategic priorities.

---

You said:

How can the relationship be improved?

ChatGPT said:

Here are some concrete, realistic ways the Norway–Germany relationship may be improved today, based on current cooperation, challenges and geopolitical conditions:

1. Strengthen predictability in the energy partnership

Energy is both an opportunity and a source of friction. Improvement requires:

a) Clear agreements on power flow and price levels

Norway may face pressure on electricity prices and domestic resistance to export, while Germany seeks stable supply.
→ The solution is more transparent mechanisms for how power flows, when export is prioritised, and how risk is shared.

b) Joint strategies for hydrogen and CCS

Hydrogen projects have suffered setbacks. Improvement would include the two countries:

• setting more realistic timelines and cost frameworks
• establishing joint investment funds
• aligning technology and regulatory standards

c) Cooperation on offshore wind

Norway has resources and technology; Germany has industrial capacity and capital.
A joint offshore-wind consortium could reduce risk for both.

2. Deepen security and defence cooperation

Both countries are becoming more strategically oriented, but the connection can be strengthened:

a) Coordinated Arctic policy

Germany depends on accurate information and Norwegian expertise in the High North.
→ Joint research programmes, monitoring and contingency planning would bring the countries closer.

b) Strengthened cooperation within NATO

More joint exercises, logistics sharing and integrated units would make the relationship more robust.

3. Better institutional dialogue (Norway is outside the EU)

The difference in EU/EEA position regularly creates friction.

a) A permanent “Norway–Germany Council”

A predictable high-level forum meeting annually to coordinate:

• energy policy
• industrial cooperation
• climate and resilience
• regulatory changes affecting the EEA agreement

This would reduce the distance between EU decisions and Norwegian interests.

b) Early notification of regulatory changes

Germany can offer Norway better advance insight into upcoming EU regulations affecting Norwegian industry.
This builds trust and predictability.

4. Deeper industrial and technological partnership

The relationship improves when it goes beyond energy:

a) Cooperation in green industry

• batteries
• green maritime solutions
• carbon capture
• hydrogen production

→ This ties the economies together and reduces vulnerability.

b) Joint investment in digital and security-critical technology

Norway has strong competence in:

• cybersecurity
• simulation and sensor technology

Germany has industrial scale.
→ A joint “technology partnership” would yield lasting strategic value.

5. Cultural and societal integration

Soft power makes political relations more resilient.

a) More educational exchanges

Increase Erasmus-like programmes between universities.

b) Joint cultural projects

Historical cooperation, art, music and language can be structuring forces.
This builds broader public support.

6. Better coordination in global policy

Germany and Norway have shared interests in:

• climate
• ocean governance
• human rights
• development policy

A more coordinated voice in international forums would strengthen the relationship and increase both countries’ influence.

Summary

The relationship can best be improved through two main pathways:

1. More predictability and realism in the major energy partnership, with clearer agreements, better risk-sharing, and concrete joint technology development.
2. Deepening of the security, industrial and EU/EEA dialogue, so that cooperation extends beyond energy and climate, gaining broader political depth and stability.